BIOSHOCK ps3 review by psm3 (93)? a slight anomaly! read on..............

[Skeeuk]

looks like the 1st review of ps3 bioshock is in by psm3 which gave it an impressive 93

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=197709

taken from review "However, PSM3 also admits: "If you're a lucky multi-format owner who favours visuals over some extra puzzle levels, you're probably better off with 360's original. Otherwise, you needn't panic: Rapture shines on every format and plays identically."

ok so it looks as if the game is obviously ported over, hence mabey a visual drop here and there. but on a recent ign preview i found this below.

http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/897/897091p2.html

"Although it was still an early build of the game, the title looks fantastic. The water effects look much slicker, as do many of the environments as they are slowly submerged in water. It's quite obvious that 2K is taking full advantage of the PS3's Blu-ray discs to pack in cleaner high resolution textures for every facet of the game"

if ign who had hands on with ps3 version who said the textures are better, water effects are better etc, taking that into account. do you think bioshock on ps3 was lowered down for retail release? that is going off the psm3 review?

why would an early build look better than final build?

discuss if you want^

and stay on topic, no flaming or trolling