Hmm, and I don't know if I agree with points 2 and 3 (sorry, only watched the first one when I typed the last post, didn't think I would watch the other two).
Resistance 2 has some awesome numbers and it does look like it has a lot of cool depth but it's also a completely different game than Gears 2 multiplayer. Just because it has 60 players does it make it better than ever other multiplayer game that doesn't have 60 players?
Of course not.
Look at something like CoD4 for example. That is a simple 3v3 but it's incredible multiplayer. If you look at TF2, probably one of the best multiplayer games *ever*, large games aren't fun. It has incredible depth and the fun games are only 6v6 to 8v8.
Quantity does not mean quality. I'm not saying Resistance 2 is bad or Gears 2 is better, I'm just saying you can't rely only on huge numbers.
As for the gameplay, he only looked at weapons. Even ignoring that the two games are incredibly different, that's the lame thing to base all of gameplay on.
