You keep refering to WoW's end game, yet you have failed to mention anything leading up to it. The quest system in WoW was quite the experience and the grind didn't start until you hit 60, 70 now, 80 in the near future. I mean yes it would be cool to take over cities and evrything, but my point in the last post was that WoW's end game sounded just as good if not better before everyone got to it as well. I mean hell, I wanted to kill Illidan myself, then it was sort of a letdown and yeah... Do you really think that taking over a city will be that different than Killing a faction leader, it would be easier I think, in WoW? You get a guild and you walk in and kill him, difference is that you get to keep the city. I'm sure there will be guilds who will just farm Kings. Since it seems to be such a big part they will reduce the difficulty so that it would be actually plausible to take over and then retake cities. What if the server imbalances? That just means that one faction will constantly have all the cities and the other will have nothing to do, imagine the bitching and moaning on the forums.
I haven't played WoW in over a year, but when I did play I enjoyed getting to the level cap a lot more than the endgame. I hear that with WOTLK the road to 80 will be even more interesting than the road to 60 or 70 and that's what I'm most excited about.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








