mrstickball said:
May I ask what's changed between December 2007 and September 2008 that would allow the Playstation 3 to close the gap by a large margin? I'd really like to see some Sony fanpeople answers using hard facts & numbers rather than just attack my logic by saying "no it won't" Here's the way I look at it: December 2007 Catalyst Information:
December 2008 Catalyst Information:
Now, with those comparisons, I am not understanding how, without a price drop, Sony is going to be able to compete during Christmas. Could someone care to tell me why and how the average consumer is going to snatch up a $400 gaming system vs. a $200 one, that would put them on an equal (or near equal) selling level?
|
Maybe, just maybe, the "average consumer" (or most any consumer) doesn't buy something he doesn't want no matter how cheap it is. Also, the $200 360 Arcade and the $400 80GB PS3 comes with different hardware and accessory configurations so you are almost comparing apples to oranges here. I by no means am saying that no one wants the 360 Arcade and everyone wants the $400 80GB PS3. But what I am saying is that you are making such a subjective and closed-minded point when varying factors apply to varying preferences to varying consumers. And because of that if the "average consumer" looks at the price and just the price ALONE as a purchasing criteria for two different products, I'd hate to see what the "below average consumer" would do. In your last post you said:
"Well, if you don't have hard numbers, and understand the marketplace, anything else you say is fanboy bias, or stupidity."
Well, how about understanding that you are just one consumer out of millions in which those millions do not exactly think the way you do, and thank God for that because "anything else you say is fanboy bias, or stupidity."
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.