By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kurakasa said:
bardicverse said:
Kurakasa said:
Maybe they just don't like wii games. Big deal?

Then they shouldn't be reviewing them. A journalist that does reviews needs to go at things with a neutral stance. Disliking a game for the fact that it isn't in HD is not a neutral stance. Plain and simple.

 

 

What are you talking about? They should not review wii games unless they give them good scores..? Clearly, if you don't like a wii game it has to be because "it isn't in HD". There can't be any other reason to dislike wii games. Never.

 

btw:

SMG 98, zelda 100, brawl 95, RE4 95, MP3 95, Okami 93... all above metacritic scores. Wtf was this thread about again? :)

You overlooked my previous thread in which a Wii game was rated much lower, even though the review clearly said it was more fun, better controls, etc. They gave a lower rating at Game Infromer specifically because "it didnt look as sharp as its HD counterparts". Well duh, imagine SD not being as crisp as HD.

Lets put it this way, in context of movies, and this also is based off of a real situation - Say there's a movie critic who absolutely HATES horror movies. Are you going to rely on their review of the next horror movie to hit the silver screen? A reviewer who hates a specific console is only going to look for things to hate in its games, not giving a good idea of what the good things are in the game.

Me personally? I think that there shouldn't be videogame reviews. Everyone has a different perspective. Go rent a game and see if you like it. Back in the day, I could rent NES games for $1/day, before Blockbuster destroyed local video shops. Was a great way to test out a game before making a purchase. We need a system like that again.