Dno said:
Chrizum said:
Dno said:
Chrizum said:
Source please. This site can get in trouble if people just blatantly rip articles and acting like they wrote it themselves. |
Are people of this site that stupid not to no this is from another article? It clearly says at the bottom "Dno says" because thats thats my view on this article. I think my fellow man on this site is much smarter then this but i will give u a link.
http://xenonxblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/is-insomniac-the-new-rare/
|
When citing somebody else's work, you just need to provide the source. I didn't created that rule, it's just the way it is.
But thanks for providing the link.
|
no problem but its stating the obvious. But i will remeber that in the future as i see it bothers a lot of people.
|
Dno...anytime you present someone else's work you have to provide a source....otherwise it is plagiarism.
Another reason we need a source is to know where this info is coming from...i.e, is this a reputable site that has been known to provide quality conjecture....or just a fanboy site that doesn't have a leg to stand on.
And you might want to edit the OP with that link.
