Right on! Get me my bingo board.
Sony PS3 wouldn't be a Sony PS3, if they had done everything you're saying. What caused Sony PS3 delays, was a miscalculation considering the tech when they started to build the hardware, ie Sony propably thought the tech would have been ready by then. Sony was aiming the Sony PS3 launch to 2005, but Blu-Ray and Cell weren't ready by then. So instead of Sony PS3, we would have Sony PS2,5 (although, that would have been more profitable for Sony).
As for the price, Sony PS3 would propably had sold better, if it had been cheaper, since price doesn't work as a factor that gets people buy the product, but it can work as a factor that turns people off from it. Besides, again, if Sony PS3 would have been cheaper, it wouldn't be the Sony PS3 as we know it.
As for what drives Wii sales, go back to 2006 and look at the lines, people were waiting in line for hours to get to try the Wii, while lines for the Sony PS3 were just some minutes, and the price to play both were the same (or actually bigger for Wii, since you had to invest so much time for waiting for a hands-on).
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
