masterb8tr said:
Garnett said:
Gnizmo said:
Garnett said:
Screwing the customer???
Did you $ony fanboys forget the PS3 launch?
60 gig- 600$
20 gig - 500$
People still bought them only to be screwed several weeks later when the newer version came out
Then the 80 gig replaced the 60 gig and shed off a extra 100$ and the poor 20 gig owners got screwed cause they paid 100$ more and 50% less hard drive space than the 40 gig
Lmao who got screwed now?
|
If you want to try and flame a group of fanboys you could try doing the bare minimum of research. The launch systems were the best models. The only thing the 20gb really lacked was wireless ability but other than that it is in everyway superior to the 80 and 40 gb units save for mostly meaningless hard drive space. If you really wanted to try and start a flame war you would make some references to the diminished feature list of the PS3 rather than whatever non-sense you put together. I miss the good old days when trolls really went the extra mile to earn the slew of angry responses.
|
The launch systems were the best system in YOUR OPINION.
no they're the best sku's period.
Now just cause you stated your OPINION that means im wrong?
No they still were ripped off.
no , the fact that sony sold it with a loss, means that people were not ripped off.
Also it does not matter about the features,When MS lowered the Price of the 360 for the premium to 300$,people said that they were screwing the customer.
|
|
The best SKU in your OPINION,They were more expensive so people may of chosen the low end version.
MS Sold xbox 360 with a loss as well,infact there in the hole with 10 mill,So i guess that means the people we not ripped off?
