By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Gnizmo said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
If he said I was making something up, I damn well have a right to argue semantics, if the crux of his accusation was about exactly what I wrote.

And I know words can be interpreted. That's why I choose them carefully. If I see I slipped up, I clarify what I meant. that didn't happen here. He misquoted me, and you know it.

 He never said you made anything up. He just restated what he thought you said with different words. See how stupid and annoying it is when someone tries to argue based on exactly what is written?

 You seemed to miss that my point was not meant just for this thread but for every arguement you ever get into. You instantly go for the semantics arguement and no one cares enough to argue with you after that. I still remember the old Resident Evil 5 threads where you kept arguing with people for daring to use the word "impossible" but not actually adding anything substantial to your posts but an objection to that term. If you want people to admit they are wrong then don't annoy them out of the conversation by splittling hairs over semantics.

 

He wrote that I was just making up some fake kind of hype.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs