Arkk on 05 September 2008
| bdbdbd said: @Arkk: So, how should it have been delayed? Considering this was on the list as "2nd priority" along with Project H.A.M.M.E.R (which also is "on hold"), the delay propably was made that "1st priority" games could have been done ready with Disasters resources. And the last delay was made for the game not to be delayed again. If i recall, Nintendo tends to delay its games always without setting a new date. |
As far as I know, Project H.A.M.M.E.R. has been cancelled, no?
http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=8826&title=Project+H.A.M.M.E.R+formally+cancelled
They should have just delayed it. A good old regular delay, you know? Usually, when a game is indefinitely delayed, it's a very bad sign.
