S.T.A.G.E. said:
Microsoft cannot face off with Nintendo for this reason aside from what you're saying. Nintendo's consoles production costs are around $180. They can afford to drop the Wii down $100 if they want. They've been making profit off of name value and the new casual market. This is why I could care less to talk about them. I'm not worried about Nintendo going up against Microsoft. I'm happy for Nintendo and they stand alone this gen. |
??? I think you want to argue with me, but you're agreeing with me?
I'm saying, MS's goal for the 199 Arcade is the fight the PS3. It will have an effect, but much less than people think because the there is already a more popular console at a similar price: the Wii.
And this is what I'm getting from you: Nintendo can easily drop the price and still be profitable from the casual market. I'm happy for them.
I think what you're trying to say is that the 360 and the Wii market to different demographics?
Which is true, but consider, the hardcore demographic will likely want a console that's not as gimped as the Arcade (no hard drive), they'd prefer to go for the higher 360s or the PS3.
Which goes back to my original point: the 60GB 360 has been selling at $299 for a month now, and it's not really helping MS beating the PS3. The Elite is the same price as the PS3, so it's not gonna help much. The Arcade will help, but much less than people think because a low tier such as it will appeal mostly to casuals, who prefer the Wii.
So basically:
High price: PS3 will sell much better than 360.
Low price: Wii will sell much better than 360.
The 360 will have a foot in each market, but underwhelmingly so, and I think that even if you add it up it wont amount to enough to overcome the PS3 for more than a couple of weeks.
PSN: chenguo4
Current playing: No More Heroes







