By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cleveland124 said:
Cueil said:
ManusJustus said:

First rule of economics: Only consider cost and benefit in the future, not the past.  It doesnt matter if XBox made a billion dollars or lost a billion dollars in the past, the only thing Microsoft should (and since they are ran by people who understand economics, do) consider is potential costs and benefits in the future.

 

while true you can get a picture about how a price drop or a large game could effect sales... we look at the past to get an idea of the future because the trends don't generally buck unless something huge happens


 

I would go one step farther and say the best indicator of the future is the past. That's why such an emphasis is placed on financial statements. Or do we need that graph that shows the Wii actually decreasing in userbase near the end of it's life while the PS3 doubles each year?

 

 

Statistics can be an amazing thing when  sales DOUBLE from 5 people to 10 people...lol...great job, while Wii see only a slight increase...but it's because it's so far ahead, there is no way to compare the two.  PS3 only shot is to catch 360, and hta'ts not looking too good with the coming price cuts either...so...from 1st to 3rd...sound like somebody is going to get fired at Sony, imho.



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder