Million said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Million said:
legend92 said:
i personally think microsoft wont see HOME as a treat and i would agree with tat it isnt a threat like who personally is actually gonna use home probly 2 million people out of the 15 million who own a PS3.
I am a playsation fan all the way owned all the Playsations and never had an xbox so personally believe wat i said |
It may not sound alot to you but 2 Million active users = Alot of potential revenue .
Personaly I feel that Microsoft won't react to Home unless it becomes a success probably meaning we wouldn't see an MS equivalent this generation if takes anywhere as long as Sony's version did. Microsoft often use tried and tested methods as opposed to oringinal or innovative things.
|
It doesn't matter whether its a success or not, they won't copy it. Thats not an online experience. Thats a virtual experience. Get it straight.
|
Are you serious ? Microsoft will copy anything that works on another console if they feel it'll benefit the XBOX brand.
Home is a vritual and >online experience< .
|
Yes, which is why they took from the Wii. That is a healthier approach to the online Exp. Everything is at your finger tips and yet you can have your avatars that can be used in videogames such as 1vs 100, Monopoly and more. The Wii allows you to do the same things in their wario, mario kart and other party games. :)
Home is a purely virtual experience that blends videogame aspects, while you're online. Like the sims, yet advertising Sony shit at every turn. It's a virtual simulation of life.
