Squilliam said:
http://www.zen8750.zen.co.uk/stats.htm Average failure time 17 months after launch. So a lot of people could have been out of pocket on launch PS2s. Since you know, you're comparing launch Xbox 360s to launch PS2s its only fair. For the PS1 its all anecdotes but what I do know is that the N64s are vastly more reliable than the PS1. You didn't have to run them upside down or anything... Microsoft still wins.
|
I fail to see how that graph helps. it is showing the average cause of failure within a 17 month time frame. The list is fairly small to try and get any consistent data from it. It is not even comparing the amount of un failed systems to the failed ones, which is how you get the percentage.
I never had a problem with my PS1, I heard no news of a high fail rate. The whole N64 being more reliable is a moot point seeing as we are comparing the XBOX line vs the PS line of consoles. N64's rate means nothing to that. Every console is going to have some form of a failure rate, but it shouldn't ever be as high as 33%, thats like the failure rate of all 3 PS systems combined.


![]()
Greatness Awaits
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)







