I already stated the source. It's someone who posted on the scores on the Neogaf forums after recieving the new EGM issue. I don't think they are fake or anything.
The EGM magazines are going out right now anyway so in the next few days I assume I will have it in my hands to read exactly what their comments were.
Also, I would think flying around on a dragon and engaging in combat close quarter and long distance with dragons and grounds troops is a pretty new game mechanic unless I'm mistaken Happy Squirel.
People keep assuming this was like Rogue Galaxy, have you seen the videos? There is a lot of close quarter combat that has nothing to do with the normal flying around and shooting, in addition to the ground fighting parts.
The only thing I see that it shares with that franchise is that they are both air combat games with very different approaches and focuses and they share the same developer.
Like I said before, I'll wait for the other reviews for both games before I am more worried but this is upsetting obviously to someone who was waiting for both games.
Also, people should not be surprised about the NCAA game getting high scores, a game like that is reviewed on its own merit, one shouldn't say 'omg NCAA 9s and Lair 5s? insanity'. It's probably a great football game for whoever want that.
Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!
