Infinite Undiscovery Review IGN 7.1/10

[ZenfoldorVGI]

Jordahn said:

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Jordahn said:

mrstickball said:
Zen - FYI, we'll only need about 18hrs to see if Goldstein is vindicated or not.

 No one needs to be vindicated. Only those who think so are holding an unwarranted personal grudge.

When a claim is levied against you, like in this instance, and then you were proven to be right, you are vindicated.

I don't know the dude, and I don't know if he "needs" to be vindicated, but if the reviews generally agree with him, he will be, if I(or you) like it or not.

I guess we all shouldn't voice opinions since there will always be people "against" us.  But since we all do express opinions, we all need to vindicated.  Oh, wait...  Ummm...

 

lol, wtf man?

All that matters is technically, the definition of vindicated is this:

vindicated
A	adjective
	1	absolved, clear, cleared, exculpated, exonerated, vindicated
		freed from any question of guilt; "is absolved from all blame"; "was now clear of the charge of cowardice"; "his official honor is vindicated"

 

By more than one person, Hillary has been accused of giving low review scores to be controversial, and/or due to elitism.

This will be proven wrong, for our purposes, if at least some other reviewers agree with him.

Then, he will, by definition, be vindicated.

I don't know or care if he or you feel the "need" for him to be vindicated. I certainly don't. However, if you deny that vendication can occour, then you just can't follow the argument.