Onyxmeth on 27 August 2008
| desmondau said: I honestly think Arcade games are priced a bit too high. For some old retro ports, they still charge you 400mp. I agree some of the new games are pretty good and could be and should be priced between 800mp and 1200mp. But most of them are small in size, short in play time, old in game design and easier to make when compared to the physical counterparts. I think MS should think of a more aggressive pricing when its main competitor PS3 is taking a healthy step on PSN to introduce its old days PS games and newly developed games. The prices on PSN, in my opinion, are much more reasonable considering the cost of distributing and developing; and more practical considering downloading the game is a cost on the part of the console owner. |
Let me try and find the connection here. The topic is about Castle Crashers' IGN review score and you are making an opinion piece on why Sony's PSN pricing is better than Microsoft's XBLA pricing. Welcome to VGChartz, but try to leave that crap for where it's welcome, which is not in this thread.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
