GamesRadar's Leipzig preliminary reviews.

[Torillian]

starcraft said:

DMeisterJ said:

starcraft said:

DMeisterJ said:
Why does Gamesradar make me hate them so?

How do you "review" a game with 10 minutes of playtime?

Because they play your most hyped PS3 exclusives then tell you they are not the Sony-saviours you were hoping for?

Jks.

Perhaps there are quality-related reasons a 4-5 year development time, $60 million+ shooter got bumped to February........

Killzone: Liberation wasn't done until Mid-2006, then they started work on KZ2 afer that.  So that's 2.5 years, rather than 4-5.  And the sixty million is speculation.

But this wasn't about Killzone 2, it was about how any game can get a score after ten minutes of playtime. 

But if you'd like to turn this into a Killzone 2 argument, I'm more than happy to have a convo about this and how you are grossly incorrect in your assumption that there are quality reasons for delay.

But if you'd like to end your sordid attempt at trolling, be my guest, since you're about as off-topic as you could get.

I think the $60 million figure has come up enough times for us to think it is quite possible, particularly given the developmental resources we know have been dedicated to this game.  They presented the KZ2 trailer at E3 2005 did they not?  Do you have a link indicating that Guerilla (which I believe now has some 125 staff) didn't begin KZ2 until after Liberation?

Do you have some evidence contrary to GamesRadar's hands-on opinion that Killzone 2's multiplayer is sub-par?

 

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3169561&p=37

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/08/25/joystiq-hands-on-killzone-2-multiplayer/

http://gamesblog.ugo.com/index.php/gamesblog/more/killzone_2_multiplayer_hands_on_preview

if GamesRadar's handson is "evidence" then I guess I win since I have more ^^