libellule on 27 August 2008
| drpunk said: I think that's what some peoples' problem with this thread is. They see it as the OP trying to predict the future, whereas I think the OP is trying more to put things into perspective. i.e. if you say the PS3 will be winning by this date, this is what sales it has to achieve. They're making no claims as to what the sales will be, or might be, just what they'll need to be. Some people just need to chill. |
Read the first part of the OP and u will see it is just another prediction based on past number that conclude : PS3 beat Xbox360 in 2,5 years. It is called trying to predict the future. It is also a claim.
It is only after that the OP try to check "which sales rate is needed for the PS3 to beat the Xbox360 in X months".
Depending which part the post you believe is the main point of the OP, you will react differently. That may explain the "2 sides" reactions seen in this trhead.
Time to Work !
