| DMeisterJ said: And we've seen early builds of games that look beautiful (too many to mention) so what's your point? There is a double standard, but it's easily beaten. Announce a game when you have some good footage of the game to show. You can announce a game a eight months or a year before it launches and have something to show from it, again, this applies to many games. There are so many games that get announced, and are accompanied by screenshots or videos that look tons better than this game, not in terms of graphics but in terms of effort. This game looks like no effort is being put into it. Why should we give this game a free pass? What about every other game that releases screenshots? Should we not judge them? If other companies know how to announce a game and release good looking screenshots, why do we let Capcom off the hook? |
If the beautiful builds were too early, so are the ugly ones. That is my point, and it should have been obvious.
And Capcom is trying to make sure people know about this game, as in people are talking about it instead of ignoring it.
Heck, it is possible they want to wow us with the final product. It could just end up being this bad. But the point is you all are still jumping the gun by assuming this is a certain indicator of the final game. Worse, you in particular are trying to justify that. Just because it's done doesn't make it right.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
