And Capcom said they wanted to get 100 zombies on DR Wii.....

[LOL MATURE]

DMeisterJ said:

LordTheNightKnight said

 

I think you mean to not expect judging the game is dumb. But as someone pointed out, if they hadn't shown the video, there would be accusations of vaporware. It's expecting a perfect early build that is dumb.

But we have seen some early builds that look like crap and then we eat our words later. The early shots for The Conduit looked bland. Or take the damn Dogz videos. The first looked slightly better than that godawful Farcry port, but now it has full shading, mapping, and lighting. On a casual game.

And we've seen early builds of games that look beautiful (too many to mention) so what's your point?

There is a double standard, but it's easily beaten.  Announce a game when you have some good footage of the game to show.  You can announce a game a eight months or a year before it launches and have something to show from it, again, this applies to many games. There are so many games that get announced, and are accompanied by screenshots or videos that look tons better than this game, not in terms of graphics but in terms of effort.  This game looks like no effort is being put into it.  Why should we give this game a free pass?  What about every other game that releases screenshots?  Should we not judge them?  If other companies know how to announce a game and release good looking screenshots, why do we let Capcom off the hook?

 

 because its capcom making a game for the wii.

Anyone who sees this dumbed down version and wants it is a moron. But anyone who sees this dumbed down version and still wants RE5 is a bigger moron.