WiteoutKing said:
I honestly shouldn't even be responding to this, because it is clearly a pile of flamebait. But, why not, I'll respond. "Good for you wii owners you have a bowling game that allows you to play by flicking your wrist, but one thing you forgot ours is better in every single way." You neglected to mention even... ONE way. Go ahead and name a few, and do try to make sure these reasons matter in a bowling game. "The ability to play an old, fat lady" doesn't really cut it.
"Plus Sony fans are not retarded like wii owners who throw their controller at their TV." Again, ignoring that this is clearly flamebait... The Wii had wrist straps. Whether people were dumb about it or not, even having equipment that kept the controller attached to their wrists didn't seem to change that people were still losing the controller. I can't really imagine any comfortable way to hold the Sixaxis, for one. Secondly, without any kind of restraint, expect to see lots of reports of Joe Schmoe breaking his HDTV with a controller.
"And Sony has owned Nintendo for over 10+ years now and continues to own them with much better systems and software." Sony isn't owning anyone right now. The system is selling pitifully right now.
"All you wii owners must be proud that your system is sold to two different age demographics and yet they both where diapers :D" More flamebait, not surprised. But hey, if selling to 10 million kids-and-middle-aged-and-older folks works better than selling to 4 million randoms, clearly Nintendo chose correctly. |
well it was clearly flamebait but I can answer your first question. Wii Sports offers only 1 way to bowl when theres many rule variations that are available like trick (shown in HVB video with the chair in the lane) 16 pin, 8 pin, and several more.
Bowling is like billards, theres many ways to play.
