I wrote this nice explanation, I was on the third paragraph and I hit shift ad delete accidentally.
I was using nice wording too, but I'll be blunt I guess.
Your wrong, I'm right and there, that's all - How am I right... (drat to this websites rules)
I wish I could just say "because your wrong."
Wii performs gaming functions with it's tech.
Tech alone is useless, PS3 performs gaming functions and many other functions with it's tech so does Xbox360, Wii also has non-gaming functions but not as many as the HD Twins.
Wii tech has nearly 50% market share, meaning nearly 50% of the gaming community believe it's worth $250, American's seem to believe it's worth more than $250- but that's all jibber, truth is these same guys almost 50% of them seem to think that HD Twins are worth their price tag.
^That's that for hardware.
Software sells hardware so guess what more people think that Wii software is fun compared to PS3 or Xbox360 but I won't mince the two, the HD Twins out pace the Wii combined on software sales.
If the value system for the Wii was going towards high end graphics and longevity in terms of those values then yes that would be the case, but the software can not be viewed similarly to the hardware, no two Wii's are different, but I can assure you Wii sports does not pack the same values as No More Heroes.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
