badgenome said:
Tigawoods said:
Gamer4eva said:
DLC you have to pay for for a repetative game, well done.
In all honesty, alot of people got bored of this particular GTA very quickly, shame really, had the potential to go far. DLC won't cut it for the masses.
Like i've always said. If GTA it was a PS3 exclusive it would be a far better game. It's not like R* are short for cash.
|
Lol well this has to be the most narrow-minded and shallow post of the day. Man I bet you could convince yourself anything. GTA hasnt exactly had groundbreaking advances in the game throughout the last few games. The game being on the PS3 only would have meant less ppl would have been disappointed. But im curious as to why you think if it was PS3 exclusive that the game would be better? If you say graphics then you need to jump in front of traffic.
|
Well, since they couldn't make full use of Blu-Ray's 50 GB capacity thanks to having to consider the 360 version, they had to leave out all the good stuff and release the version that disappointed so many people. I mean, it's so obvious! 
|
If I already had a great product gameplay-wise i'd take more money over exclusivity to a console for the sake of graphics. Everytime I hear a Sony fanboy talk about graphics, it makes me think about how sad they really are pushing its graphics when last gen they had to fight with Xbox fanatics because of the PS3's inferior graphics yet impressive installed base and exclusive 3rd party games.
