Squilliam said:
Rainbird said:
Squilliam said:
Reasonable said:
Even as a PS3 owner I have to say 'I hope its not'. I just loath timed exclusives (and exclusives in general unless built from ground up for one and one platform only and preferably by 1st/2nd tier party development).
Perhaps its just coming from PC background but to me third party exclusives on games that could easy be on both consoles are like a PC game that only works with Nvidia cards and not ATI... not sensible.
Let the consoles stand or fall on their own merits. Build something just for your own console if you want to show off unique capabilities and/or own the IP - but don't pay for timed exclusives. Just annoying for gamers in general.
|
And don't buy studios, infact sell them all off. Its terrible for gamers when studios become locked to one particular platform at the expense of not releasing games for other platforms.
I just had to add to your statement, it seemed incomplete.
|
Now, wasn't that irrelevant Squil? 
|
Why? In order of bad: Buying studios >>>>>> Buying full exclusivity >>>>>> Timed exclusives.
|
Then you should say so, instead of adding it to anothers post, when they said they don't mind 1st/2nd party games, when buying studios just mean an increase in workforce for your 1st party studios.
