Hm, so basically if Pachter wishes it hard enough it must be true? Every time that man is cited in an article, the article seems to be based more off of wild speculation and misinterpretation of imperfect data, and less off of actual fact, reason, logic, or journalistic integrity. I'm sure he has the best of intentions, but he really needs to get out of the reactionist journalism business. His reputation with sources that count is going to only get worse if he keeps hobnobbing with people who write stuff like this...
Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.








