Grey Acumen said: Is anyone else noticing that the arguments for Link go into detail on weapons, items, the way they can be used, point out that Link has also beaten Gods and ways in which he can become invulnerable, as well as tactics that can be used to counter Kratos attacks and tactics. Arguments supporting Kratos constantly go "Kratos would kill Link"(no other supporting points made) or "Kratos killed a god/is immortal" and "Kratos led an army, which somehow is proof he's not dumb, and not easily tricked, as one would be led to believe by how he was apparently tricked into killing his own family" When I first got into this, I thought it would make a really cool debate, but the only place I see any real thought taking place is on Link's side. So this is kinda getting boring now. Is there maybe someone who can actually offer a compelling argument about how Kratos would take on Link, defend against Link's attacks, successfully deal with his defenses, and then actually manage to attack successfully? I mean, with that it would at least make it look like Kratos stands a chance, but with arguments as they are now, I'm actually MORE convinced that Kratos would get his butt kicked. |
That's because to even pass off the idea of an effiminate pixie child beating the God of War as moderately plausable, you'd have to put a whole lot of thought into it and make up a load of bullshit.
There's no need to do that with Kratos, because it's just common sense that he would win. It's like saying the sky is blue. There's no reason to explain why.
"Kratos is a god", "Kratos killed Zeus".... "Bu-bu-but Link has fairies!"
ROFL.