the biggest problem is with out cooling cpu's max out at 3.2 ghz so instead of making 4.0 or 4.5 ghz they go the way of multicore 2 cpu's 4 cpu's even with die shrinks. So gpu's are way more advanced then cpu's interms of transistors.
that going to a centralized chip cpugpu that does both is what manufacturers are looking into. Amd owns Ati now and who knows maybe MS will be forced into a deal with Amd if it sticks with Ati as its graphics chip.
Also this Ibm supercomputer talk seams mute why did Mac leave Ibm and return to intel why do PC's play games better then macs????
if intels cpu's suck so bad why doesnt ibm rule the pc market???
I agree they probably do own the supercomputer market but thats a highend costly market where that much power isnt going into a console and he cell in the ps3 isnt the same as the supercomputer way more cache and sorts!
Of course if it is the same that would be interesting.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
