| Onyxmeth said: If your counter is you having insider information that you can't share, then understand mine and possibly others' skepticism on the matter. From my perspective, there is 9 months of silence on this, so unless you can divulge info and back it up or this becomes public knowledge, i'll have to have my doubts this can be done. I'm not saying you're lying by any means, but I don't know you enough to trust your word. I don't think you know or trust me enough either understandably, but if you want you could PM it to me and I won't tell anyone whatever is in the PM. I was going to say it previously and forgot to mention that I agree Epic may just be holding out to let someone else to do the work, since they would benefit regardless with future Wii licensees.
|
And I don't blame your skepticism either.
What I can state is that engines take years to develop, as do games, so a 9 month moment of silence is not really anything to look too deeply into. We have games that go a year or more with little word on their progress so a game engine from a developer who has yet to come forward at all has little reason to say anything yet.
You make a good final point though only that developer will have access to the Wii UE3 engine because they can't sub-license the UE3 tech and if they were just using this developer as a sub contractor for UE3 Wii development, I think it would have been stated already instead of the rough words from Epic. However, like I said earlier they are reactionary such that if this developer is successful with the Wii UE3 engine, you can bet the shirt on your back they'll be right there to get their own share of the pie.
The rEVOLution is not being televised
