By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Squilliam said:
Epic can make more money where they are,while there have been countless good arguments that developers (In general) would make more money developing on the Wii and thats fine. When the exception walks in the door you don't have to have a hissy fit and start calling them names. Its pretty immature, people just walk away.

 

You obviously didn't read the first post. We know ALREADY they don't want to make games for the Wii. That's NOT what's setting us off. It's lying that Wii owners wouldn't buy their games.

They don't have to make games for the Wii. Just don't lie that there aren't enough Wii owners who would buy those kinds of games.

Epic: Our games don't appeal to the wii crowd enough to make the development costs worthwhile

 Blackened is the unstated premise.

Geez, people read things so litterally nowadays.

Furthermore on the blackened development costs mean - time, return on investment, best use of resources etc.

 

Proof? You don't have any, and unless Epic provides some, it's a lie.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs