Viper1 said:
That doesn't make any sense. If the top 20 DVD's sell 22 million units at $20 each = $440 million. Revenue wise you get close to your 93/7 split. But, the remaiing DVD sales are likely to be far, far higher than the remaining BD sales which would alter the revenue split well above 93/7.
|
Sure it makes sense, if it was only top 20 then BD's revenue market share would be higher than it's unit market share, but it's not.
The figures you suggest puts BD unit market share at 5.3% of top 20, but we already know it was 10%. If we use your $20/$25 DVD/BD prices then BD revenue market share should be 25% higher than it's unit market share which would give it a top 20 revenue market share of 12.5%. Seeing as BD actually only had 7% of revenue market share then it must be losing a lot of revenue market share outside of the top 20, which is what we both would expect.
Clearly the revenue figures cannot be top 20 only.
Actual revenue was: DVD $124.93m / BD $9.42m if DVD took 40% of it's revenue from the top twenty, and BD took 80% of it's revenue from the top 20 then that would give top 20 revenue split of $49.97m/$7.54m or 87%/13%, close to the 87.5%/12.5% which would be expected if BDs averaged 25% higher than DVDs.
That would put revenue outside the top 20 at $74.96m for DVD and $1.88m for BD, for a market share split of 97.5%/2.5%.
Add those both together and you get 93%/7% for the whole market.







