New Forever Blue Video: At Least Three Gamecube's Worth of Graphics

[omgwtfbbq]

akuma587 said:

omgwtfbbq said:

akuma587 said:
I think Kwaad was provoked if anything. The game really does look worse than several Gamecube games I can think of (Smash Bros. and RE4 off the top of my head), particularly because it is a first party title (isn't it?). I agree that nobody would have complained if people would have dissected a PS3 or a 360 game. The 50% GC comment was a bit much, but it does look noticeably worse than the best GC graphics I have seen.

In any case, the game could be interesting as long as it doesn't get repetitive. I like games that are relaxing (I loved flOw to death). I don't think I would pay $50 for it though. $40 would be acceptable, $30 is a good number for what I have seen.

No.

It takes all of 10 seconds to determine that this game is developed by "Arika", which appears to be a smallish development house based from former capcom developers that have produced a horde of Street Fighter and Tetris clones.

The game is published by Nintendo, which I assume makes it second party? I never really got the distinction between first and second party. Anyway, for a small time developer they really made the game look good. Don't use the above sea sections to judge it's clear that the resources went into the under water bits as that's where the main part of the game is.

 

I still expect more out of this game because it is being published by Nintendo. 2nd party devs usually get much more attention than 3rd parties, so my argument still stands.

don't buy it then

easy solved.