Nintendo lying about third party dominance?

[DKII]

This combination of MS spin and Sterling's inability to turn on his brain is pretty stupid:

MS' David Dennis went as far as to say: "No matter how you slice it, the Wii third party game story is not a pretty one." Certainly a far cry from Nintendo's claims that its third parties were selling "better than our competitors." If these figures are to be believed, then that's just a blatant falsehood.

The fact that Sterling just regurgitated what MS spoon-fed him without any original thought at all is pretty sad journalism, imo. These gaming blogs are all so heavily MS-leaning, it's very odd.

If you know statistics at all, Nintendo's chart is the most neutral way to look at them. Just like how a couple months ago it was meaningless crap when MS said that since they were the first to reach 10M systems in the US it meant they'd already won (even tho it took Nintendo 11 months fewer to reach that same mark and then passed the 360 that month, not looking back), yet people ate it up 'cause they don't use their brains. People believe what they want to be true, not what is true.