horriblebastard said:
Now you are admitting it's the weakest. That's a good start. You're getting there. ;) Gameplay AND graphics make good games. It's not a choice between the two (unless you only own a Wii). It's a total falsehood to think that having a system with weaker graphics leads to better games in some way. Developers are actually limited by that in fact, not the other way round and there are dozens of examples of Wii games with shit graphics and shit gameplay so it's as susceptible to that as any other system. It's just that the best you're going to get on it will always be worse in a couple of aspects than the best you'll get on any of the other systems.
|
"Limitations" often lead to creativity in general and in games specifically ... On top of that, several of the best videogames of all time have been produced for handheld systems which have never even been close to the graphical capabilities of the home console systems of their time.
Just because the PS3 can now produce more advanced graphics does not mean that the games available for the PS2 were shit. Why would a system which can outperform the PS2 be forced to have "shitty" games when most of the good PS2 games are still pretty good by today's standards?
