By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NJ5 said:
akuma587 said:

 

Or because Greenpeace looks at a lot more than one criteria...Its not like they have anything to gain by saying one video game company is better than another.

Actually they didn't look at any criteria in their (non-)evaluation of Nintendo. They didn't judge any data because Nintendo didn't give them details about manufacturing.

Instead of taking the console apart and analyzing it, Greenpeace simply gave them a zero score... No other factors were taken into account (such as power consumption). Their report is a joke.

 

 

Though I like Apple and Nintendo as companies and in terms of what they produce, as a consumer I wish they would...well, care about the world more, by 1) making at least some effort to be eco-friendly and then 2) publicize that they are doing so.  To do neither is really...fucked.

Jobs has finally, finally caved and has started to give a damn about unnecessary use of pollutants, which a large segment of his consumers care about (many of whom may be stockholders as well.)