Kurakasa said:
Nah, your post is so badly formatted that it hurts my eyes. Anyway, by looking at those specs it is pretty much the same. Compare those specs to 360/ps3, there IS a difference. |
Too bad specs aren't the only thing that determines the power of a console. If that were the case I could say that a 4 year old cpu is more powerful than a dual core of today since the Pentium 4 is clocked at 3.2ghz, and lets say this dual core is clocked at 2.4ghz. In reality the Dual Core allows for better performance because of its architecture. This is even more clear when Amd made the better single core cpus. THey were clocked at lower frequencies, but usually ourperformed the pentiums that Intel used. THe same works for consoles. While the xbox and the Wii might have similar cpu frequencies the Wii could use more of the cpu than the xbox because its architecture is more efficient. It gets far more complicated than that when you use that for almost every single component. The GC and Wii architectures allow for far less bottlenecks rather than raw power. Also we know very little on the WIi's hardware because Nintendo hasn't release official specs. Some of those specs are assumed, while others are most likely true. We don't know too much in detail about aditions taht aren't as clear as cpu clock speed, gpu clock speed, and ram speed.
