| BMaker11 said: they want it on there because of the success of the console? Yeah, because Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, and Enchanted Arms sold millions.....wait...they didn't. Success relative to the PS3, I guess. I think it's because SE need to make some money NOW. Otherwise, 360 might have to wait for Last Remnant. Also, with the supposed (comparative) ease of porting to 360 and the lengthy localization process, who knows that the 360 version is actually going to cause that much of a delay? First bold: Wrong, the Wii is Yeah, this is just bullshit on their part. But we should all be used to people failing to acknowledge the Wii's existance by now, I guess. Second Bold: And that's your only foothold, everywhere else, you're being dominated Not everywhere else. "I actually think it’s a great partnership. Square has done games for us in the past, and I think there’s a point where Square just has to look at the Xbox 360, the install base and attach rates that we’re seeing and actually has to make a decision on their own that it’s the right thing to do for them." First bold: FFXI? Don't forget Project Sylpheed! Second bold: Like the less than 10% attach rate for the current JRPGs on the platform, but over 50% attach rate for shooters? Not even Halo 3 has an attach rate over 50%. "I think it’s easy to assume that something’s going on behind the scenes, I think the more obvious answer is we’re doing really well and the game creators want their games to be where the most people and the most consoles [are], and right now that’s the Xbox 360" First bold: He just downplayed, or rather, made it clear that money was involved Your assumption. Clearly you're reading what you want to into that. Second bold: Wrong again....Wii Yup. |
