By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

they want it on there because of the success of the console? Yeah, because Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, and Enchanted Arms sold millions.....wait...they didn't.

I think, no, I know SE only put it on there because of a fat check from M$...I mean, come on, the PS3 version is gonna be done at least 6 months before the 360 version, yet it's having a simultaneous release? But then when the PS3 version of Last Remnant isn't done, they won't make a simultaneous release for that version? WTF!

"I mean, we’re the leading console on a worldwide basis, we’re more than double the install base on the US."

First bold: Wrong, the Wii is

Second Bold: And that's your only foothold, everywhere else, you're being dominated

"I actually think it’s a great partnership. Square has done games for us in the past, and I think there’s a point where Square just has to look at the Xbox 360, the install base and attach rates that we’re seeing and actually has to make a decision on their own that it’s the right thing to do for them."

First bold: FFXI?

Second bold: Like the less than 10% attach rate for the current JRPGs on the platform, but over 50% attach rate for shooters?

"I think it’s easy to assume that something’s going on behind the scenes, I think the more obvious answer is we’re doing really well and the game creators want their games to be where the most people and the most consoles [are], and right now that’s the Xbox 360"

First bold: He just downplayed, or rather, made it clear that money was involved

Second bold: Wrong again....Wii