Yes, I believe in God.
People who do not often challenge my logic in believing in something that has no "proof". They say I have replaced "proof" with "faith" because there is no evidence to support it.
I respond by saying, the alternative is to believe that the simple atoms of the universe somehow organized themselves into something that could become alive and self-aware and develop ideas of right and wrong. I ask how much "proof" there is that this is possible and how much "faith" is required because there is no evidence to support it.
Believing and disbelieving require the same amount of faith.
Either water and random chemicals became us on their own, or they had help.
Which is more logical? Which one seems right?
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, always assume you have the upper hand.
NNID = RangerOne
Switch = SW-2393-3671-6907
