Do Nintendo and Sony take the whole of the logistic of only gaming instead of EA like Xbox Live or is there some cost EA assume for these online game which is then pay back to them by these company? That's the real question it seem, because a paying service is the only meaningful difference(in term of revenue) between all of the three company. Not sure, even if that was the case, that it would account for such a difference though.
That say your promise is flawed, why wouldn't the PS3 the biggest contributor to EA revenue? You only say it "doesn't make sense", which as justifcation go, is pretty low on the standard meter. Why wouldn't it be indeed? You dont start a analysis to prove something, you do one and then present the resultat, whatever you like them or not.
Persons without argument hide behind their opinion
