Abercrombie selling printed message thongs to 10 year olds

[ssj12]

Onyxmeth said:

ssj12 said:

Onyxmeth said:

ssj12 said:
if parents buy them for their kids whose fault is it? the parents not the supplier.

That's true, granted the child doesn't just buy it themselves. I was making my own purchases before my teenage years, and nothing mentions there being an age restriction to purchase the thongs. There should still be an ethical standard set by the supplier. If they went a step further with thongs that have the heart shape cut out of the back, and have a cat on the front, is it not wrong of them to offer that? What if the next step is to offer g-strings? Edible thongs? Do you not think there should be a moral standard for suppliers to not offer such trash?

 

 

g-strings. thongs.. they are basically the same lol

please walk into a Spencers sometime. They sell sex toys and shit in the malls in America. I think there is an age restriction on sales but kids are seen in there all the time.

 

The sex toys at Spencers are for adults. Like you said, children cannot purchase them. If a parent were to purchase one for their child, Child Protective Services could step in if notified and remove the child. None of that has anything to do with thongs made for children. A child can also walk into a Burdines in any mall in America and see a thong, but that doesn't mean it was made for them, fits them, is marketed for them and is purchasebale for them. Also...

This is a thong:

This is a G-String:

They may both ride a woman's ass crack but one has considerably less fabric.

Here's what the front could look like:

When is it considered wrong for Abercrombie to offer this for 10 year olds?

 

 

 

 

I did say basically. They are very similar in many ways, just as you said, one has less fabric but they both brawl up the female's butt.

And nope, but if a product didnt sell they wouldnt stock it.