By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NJ5 said:
@ssj12: I'd have to look at those interviews hehe. Not doubting that though.

Regarding physics processors, how is he wrong? These dedicated physics cards aren't taking off. That's what he predicted.

"Carmack, like Intel, Nvidia and DAAMIT, appears to think that using GPU and CPU capacity to handle this stuff is a much better idea than requiring an extra add-in card."

 

because the industry is taking an either or approach to it. The nVidia drivers will allow either a dedicated physx card or all physics calculations to be done on the GPU. Like I said, nVidia will be bundling the Physx Card with the GTX 2x0 soon but offering the driver which allows for either or.

So similar to what he said about multi-threaded/multi-core processors, Physics processing in an form is just taking a while to take off but it will.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453