Graphics: Killzone 2 or Gears of War II?

[kn]

makingmusic476 said:

kn said:
One important thing that I think people are missing here: Guerrilla Games is a wholly owned first party developer for Sony is it not? Epic is wholly third party. It is amazing to me that we are comparing a first and third party game. You read into that what you want.

 

Epic also specializes in making engines. It's their main money maker, and you can guarantee that they are 10x better with their own engine than any of their licensees.

GG was bought by Sony only a year and a half ago. I find it funny that at the time, people would've been like, "Geurrilla vs Epic? lulz," and yet now people are saying, "Geurrilla is first party. It SHOULD look better," despite the fact that Epic are some of the best engine developers in the industry. Honestly, show me a first party game on Microsoft's own console that matches Gears.

Of course, I'm not saying that being first party doesn't effect things, as it certainly does. I just wish more people would realize that being first party will help Geurrilla improve the Killzone franchise in more ways than just graphics...

 

This is great.  STAGE assumed I was going one way and you assume I'm going the other.  (I think).  I find it interesting that we are comparing first party to third party developed games.  That's all.  I'll say it again for the hard of reading:  You read into it what you want.