Graphics: Killzone 2 or Gears of War II?

[reptile168]

NJ5 said:

MakoInfused said:

NJ5 said:

thekitchensink said:

MakoInfused said:
IMO, i don't care if a game runs at .5 FPS, as long as it looks,runs good.

The human eye doesn't even detect the FPS..so why bother...

Ummm... mind telling me how it's possible for a .5fps game to run good? XD The framerate IS how good it runs.

 

Lol, that's a slide-show. This post just goes to show how much most people really know about graphics, let alone enough to do a comparison of two games.

 

 

Lol, it was hypothetical, I know it isn't possible :P

What i ment was that as long as the game runs good, you won't notice a thing...or you mean to tell me that when you play a game you can tell how many FPS it's running just by playing it ?

I can definitely tell when there's slowdown and it drops. And in some genres, I can tell if it's 30 fps or 60 fps (although some clever tricks like motion blur can make 30 fps look much better; incidentally, the same reason why movies are fine at just 24 fps).

 

 

Motion blur, exactly what all PS3 games have compared to their 360 counterpart.

 

Back to the point, asking K2 or GOW2 graphics is like asking fanboys PS3 or 360. You will just get fanboys supporting their games. As we speak, in terms of real gameplay, Gears of War 2 seems to be the leader. Killzone 2, just like every thing PS3, seems to bet on potential. Potential potential potential. I wouldn't put my eggs in Sony's basket for this.