disolitude on 31 July 2008
| Phrancheyez said: By saying you didn't like the gameplay in 1, what I hear is, "I played Gears before Resistance, and didn't like Resistance as much because of that.' Which makes a lot more sense..I played Resistance before Gears, and didn't like the gameplay in Gears at all. They're both shooters, but both very different. The thing is, these 2 games - Gears of War and Resistance, will - until the end of either series - be compared to each other. And more than likely, whichever game you play first, you'll probably like more. The reason I say this is because I have the exact opposite opinion. I played Resistance first and found it amazingly addicting. Not to mention, no online multiplayer shooter has ever tracked stats - EVER - better than Resistance. I also found Gears to be pretty boring. Though, all of my 360 friends who had Gears and tried Resistance on my PS3 had the same opinion as you, and we've all liked all the same shooters in the past. I honestly think that whichever you play first, you'll probably like better - with a few of you being the exception, of course. |
Um no...I treid Gears first sure...but I played halo, counterstrike, quake, doom, duke nukem, Unreal...etc well before any of those. To me Resistance doesn't measure up to best FPS games available in 2006...gameplay wise.
No one is talking about gears and comparing it to Resistance...
To insomniacs credit, that was their first shot at fps. They probably learned a trick or two.
Things like...if you have a health bar and med pacs, don't make respawn points so far back when you die that you have to replay a good chunk of the level before you are back to the place you died at.
