Griffin said:
How is not liking one odd looking cell shaded game "Fanboy gibberish". When i liked another odd looking cell shaded looking game. I just found Tales bad in comparsion to the Enternal Sonata demo. I also found the CoD2 demo bad on XBL, but i better not say that, you might think its fanboy gibberish for some reason |
Well sir, before I made my comments, I did a little research into your posting history.
I remembered getting into an argument with you way back when, and I also remember you saying something audacious about the Nintendo Wii. At that time I researched you and found you were a Sony fanboy, please don't take offense, I find all posters on this site can be classified as some sort of "fanboy" it's just an inconvinient truth.
So, I went into your posting history again, like I said, to see if any of your recent posts were pro 360. I found one.
I only played the 360 demo of the last MoH game and it was really good, the gameplay and the atmosphere was amazing. If they can continue with the great gameplay and get a right tone for the atmosphere then this could be a really great game.
However, I also found this post:
MS has you guys waiting just aslong for games, Splinter cell, Alan Wake, Huxley, Halo Wars. These games have been touted for over two years now. Plus whatever other games they show or announce then never bring to market.
Of course the phrase "you guys" stood out for me, so I went a little farther back, researching you(I won't reproduce the results here, as at time of said research, those posts went undocumented), and I saw a tale of someone who had been emboldened and embittered since the big E3 splitup where fanboys were tragically thrown into hardcore mode with the announcment of FFXIII and the bitter feelings that followed.
You're still as much of a Wii hating foeboy as ever, but now you've become diehard in your Sony comments.
So I made a presumption, of course.
First let me say this. There is no doubt that most things you, or I say is "fanboy gibberish." We're both fanboys. In fact, I've noticed your PSN tag in your sig, but not your 360 tag.
However, the two assertions you've made in this post raise the gibberish level to new heights. Let's examine them.
"I think you could be right, this was by far one of the worst games i have ever seen, the demo on XBL was just really bad. Now eternal Sonata had a great demo and the game looked great, and just look how bad that game sold."
Lets take the bolded part first, and remember we're operating under the assumptions that you are a Sony fanboy, and you are well aware that this title is a 360 exclusive.
"This was by far one of the worst games i have ever seen" Not "played" mind you, but seen. That statement impies two things if taken literally. Either you've never seen many games, or you've got bad tastes in them.
So, I'll assume you were embellishing for effect. I do that often as well.
Next, "eternal Sonata had a great demo" implies that you haven't actually played the game. It's average. However, that begs the question of why? Is it because you simply don't like RPGs, can't afford it, or choose not to purchase it at this time due to some unknown factor. You speak very positively about the game. Now lets assume you realize that soon it's getting a PS3 release. This only furthers my suspicion of your true motivations.
Now, referring to Rock_ons ludcrious prediction of 200,000 worldwide which he obviously posted for flamebait, you said:
"It sounds like the right thing to post in a thread asking about sales for this new Tales game."
You actually tried to flame me for having the audacity to call him on his flamebait fanboyism, as if his prediction was valid. This proves either one of two things. You are hoping this game will fail, while internally realizing that it won't fail as hard as that, or that you are simply ignorant of videogame sales in general and make vast absolute mispredictions. Of course there is always the possibility that you disagree with the man, and are simply sticking up for his rights, but I dismissed that instantly due to my pre-notions about you as a poster, and how agressive your response was to me.
Realistically, lets be honest here. I can't prove without a shadow of a doubt the motivations behind your actions, but I can prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the reasons you claim this game is "the worst game ever" and "will sell under 200,000 LTD" is sony fanboyism. More specifically, the game in question is a 360 exclusive, which automatically makes the game enemy number one to you. So, you've attacked it, and tried to flame me, simply because you thought you could get away with it. You thought I had no case to present. You thought wrong. You should have realized that with as much of this dribble as you post on these forums, somebody would catch on to your obvious and well known game that you try to run on 360 exclusives.
You want me to be honest here? I'm not certain you're being honest with us. Unless you indeed still maintain that ToV's demo is one of the worst you've ever seen, and it won't sell 200,000 copies, which is entirely your opinion, and right to say.
However, it is my right to give proper background and to question those comments.
Next time you address me, "which if you'll recall I asked you to never do again quite a long time ago" please do so in a more civil and less hostile manner. I'm really a friendly guy. I just don't like it when I get in court and you keep telling me "haha, you can't prove it" when it's obvious to everyone. I don't have to prove it. This isn't a court of law. I've let my opinion be known here. Most people will probably agree with it. That's as far as I need to take it. Thank you sir. Let this be the last word on the matter for all our sakes.
On a side note. My gamertag is Zenfoldor. Add me.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
