ioi said:
It is our policy to handle data in this way - that is how we ensure that whenever you visit the site the data is as up to date and accurate as possible. Why keep data up that we know is incorrect? Adjustments most often come from internal corrections and adjustments as well as comparisons with external data points. I'm not sure what is so irritating about it?
|
It's irritating because most people want to live in a black and white world of absolute truth. They want to look at a question, establish The Truth, and move on to the next question.
They hate the complexity of a world full of uncertain probabilities, where shades of grey force us to visit and revisit every question to see if we've gotten closer to truth than we were before. It's a lot more work, especially if you lay a lot of decisions on what you had previously thought to be true.
Most people don't actually understand what statistics are or what they mean. Rather than seeing these adjustments as constantly moving closer to truth, they think you're moving from one lie to another.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







