1. A cheap game is cheap to you... one mans garbage can be another mans treasure.
2. Low budget games are made low budget and are expected to sell to at least see profit, that's the purpose of any product and no one does something they can't afford unless they are insane or Microsoft.
3. @ - "Finally a third party that takes the Wii seriously" How many times are people going to say that, the best thread I've seen in a while dealing with this social hot spot was from Steve; about what people really expected from E3.
4. High Budget - I lol'd to a past article about Hells Gate and Flag Ship Games going under. Developers just followed suite not because they wanted to just make HD games but because they knew publishers would want it. Remember developers get paid anyway so it's the publisher who has to like money. (Not reffering to development firms.)
5. Value - Shooters are dumb and require no skills, it's just point and shoot using two analog sticks which is pointless and gimmicky but some how the gimmick cought on and now right analog is for looking around and the left is for moving. Shooters are for idiots. But now they are the mainstay genre and people love them and say stuff like they are immersive. The genre has value now and blar, but no matter what - in the content of section 5, shooters were for idiots and had no value.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
