By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MontanaHatchet said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
And if Montana meant the quality of the games, I'm not going to argue on subjective opinions. I just meant what they thought of the Wii audience. They know the Wii audience has more than just parents not paying attention to the games they buy.

Well they're not idiots. I'm sure they've read up on reports about demographics. They just made the conscious decision that they can make more money off of shovelware than higher quality games on the Wii, which is true. If you read most of Ubisoft's financial reports, they talk about how Imagine and Dogz make them most of their money, while the only time a PS3 or 360 games gets mentioned is upon its launch (where the sales are large).

 

 

Of course those games are almost guaranteed to make money, given their low costs. But they can't just not make core games at all, or else they would lost their top tier developer position. Diversifying thier portfolio and all that. And since the Wii has core gamers, they are making core games on the Wii as well.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs