By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Burgles on 28 July 2008
Edit Thread
axumblade said:
Burgles said:
Jordahn said:
This news goes to show that those who have a decent handle on PS3 development have been able to develop visually higher quality games (such as the recent Soul Calibur IV) than it's multi-platform counterpart. And being and "exotic" system to develop for implies the potential of the console itself for the long run. Maybe the "10 year" lifespan of the PS3 might have more validity.


 No it doesn't, where's your reasoning for saying that?

Basides, in an RTS the CPU is the main problem and I believe the way in which an RTS does stuff is going to be much more complicated to get going smoothly (lots of different AI stuff happening at the same time) on the PS3 due to the way it handles stuff...

Have a look on Wikipedia on the "Cell" and you'll find out a lot :)

oh. Okay. Wikipedia. Cause we all know that that's the most reliable website to back you up. I'd believe Nintendo Power posting on the Cell processor before I'd believe Wikipedia. A Website where people can actually edit articles.

Just go and read instead of bitching to me, it might not be the most accurate source for everything in the world but its pretty close. This isn't the sort of subject that is in part down to opinion, the way a CPU works is hardly debateable...It is as it is...The article goes into some detail.

 

If you don't want to then don't, just don't bother taking that tone with me when I've only just given some possible answer as to the comments of the EA developer.

The article clearly explains why porting code on the Cell is difficult because of the way it operates...

Whats with all the argumentative nonsense?